Development and Testing

We prioritize the adoption and support of automated testing to enhance the efficiency of your solution and QA and software testing processes. We use advanced automation tools that help us streamline testing workflows, reduce manual effort, and accelerate the delivery of efficient software. Accordingly, our clients get optimized testing strategies and faster time-to-market.

Keenethics cares that specialists stay at the forefront of implementing the best industry practices. Through investing in regular educational events, we guarantee we remain a trusted partner for our clients, offering effective solutions to complex challenges at any level. 

Our QA specialists assess the performance and reliability of your solution under different load conditions and relevant testing activity. We conduct real user traffic, check your systems, and enhance the user experience by identifying performance errors and vulnerabilities. We address any fixes by properly optimizing resource allocation.

Only after consulting with our clients, we form custom test plans, with custom methodologies and approaches that align best with their requirements and goals. We offer comprehensive testing coverage across all aspects of the solution, from functionality to compatibility.

Through conducting security testing, our development team identifies vulnerabilities and security flaws within the software to evaluate the scope of security controls and configurations against threats. We employ automated scanning tools, manual code reviews, and security audits to ensure all dependencies work properly.

Forming a plan for testing follows the same pattern as any software planning process. The structure of all plans should have the same structure, but their content will vary, depending on the degree of risk, testers perceive as related to the software being developed. We acquire the project requirements, set up testing goals, and devise a plan to accomplish the goals. 

Incomplete, inaccurate, or inconsistent requirements cause most software failures. The inability to get requirements right during the requirement-gathering phase can also significantly increase the implementation cost. Testers, through verification, must determine that requirements are accurate, complete, and don’t conflict with one another.

This step tests both external and internal design, primarily through verification techniques. The testers usually have to monitor so that the planning achieves the objectives and that the design works efficiently on the designated hardware.

The method chosen to build software based on internal design documents determines the type and extent of tests needed. As the development becomes more automated, less testing is required during this phase. However, if the software uses the waterfall process, it’s subject to error and will be verified. Our experience in software testing shows that it’s significantly cheaper to spot defects during the development phase than through dynamic testing during the test execution step.

Acceptance testing allows users to gauge the applicability and usefulness of software in performing their day-to-day job functions. This tests what the user believes software should perform, as opposed to what the documented requirements state.

Test reporting is a continuous process. It may be both oral and written. Defects and concerns must be reported to the appropriate parties as early as possible so that improvements are done at the lowest possible cost.

Testing improvement can best be achieved by evaluating testing effectiveness at the top of every software test assignment. While this assessment is primarily performed by testers, it should involve developers, users of software, and quality assurance professionals.